Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning Models to Improve Motivation and Scientific Attitude of Students at SDN Banjarejo
Abstract
The learning model used by the teacher in the classroom based on the results of the researchers' initial observations is still conventional, student motivation is low and students' scientific attitude is lacking. Teachers need to use a suitable and PAIKEM learning model. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze scientific motivation and attitudes before and after following the CTL model. The research method is a quasi-experimental design with one group pretest and posttest design techniques. The sample in this study were all fourth grade students at SDN Banjarejo Kendal which consisted of 24 students. Techniques and instruments for collecting data are the psychological scale of students' motivation and scientific attitudes. The data analysis technique used non-parametric statistical tests. The results showed that the students' motivation and scientific attitude before and after following the CTL model were that students experienced significant positive differences. This is reinforced by the results of hypothesis testing 1 and 2, which is the value of below the value of = 5%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahsani, E. L. F., & Nurhaliza, Y. A. (2021). Penerapan Pembelajaran STEAM untuk Mengembangkan Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Daerah Terluar Terdepan Tertinggal Indonesia. Al Hikmah: Journal of Education, 2(1), 91-100.
Ahsani, E. L. F., Romadhoni, N. W., Layyiatussyifa, E. L., Ningsih, W. N. A., Lusiana, P., & Roichanah, N. N. (2021). Penguatan Literasi Digital dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Indonesia Den Haag. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ke-SD-An, 8(2), 228–236.
Andrian. 2010. Media Pendidikan IPA Membuat Muridku Pintar. Jakarta: Ganeca Exact.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R., dan Koestner, R. 2001. “The Pervasive Negative Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation: Response to Cameronâ€. Review of Educational Research, 71: 43–51.
Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. 2016. Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Glynn, S. M. dan Winter, L. K. 2004. â€Contextual Teaching and Learning of Science in Elementary Schoolâ€. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16 (2): 51-63.
Gusmentari, S. 2014.â€Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Kelas IV C dalam Pembelajaran IPA di SD Muhammadiyah Condongcaturâ€.Tesis. PGSD. Yogyakarta: UNY.
Hudson, C. C. dan Whisler, V., R. 2012. “Contextual Teaching and Learning for Practitionersâ€. Systemics, Cybernetic and Informatics Journal, 6 (4): 54-58.
Isnaeni, A., & Ahsani, E. L. F. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Model Resitasi Berbasis Teknologi Bagi Siswa MI/SD. As-Sibyan, 3(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.52484/as_sibyan.v3i2.196
Johnson, E. B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It Is Here to Stay? California, USA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Kirch, S. A . 2007. †Re/Production of Science Process Skills and A Scientific Ethos in An Early Childhood Classroomâ€. Journal of Cult Stud of Sci Educ 2: 785-845.
Kunandar. 2009. Guru Profesional, Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Lusiana, N. E., Mardliyah, U., Humaidah, H. N., Roihatun, Safaah, N., & Ahsani, E. L. F. (2021). Analisis Pembelajaran di Sekolah Indonesia Kuala Lumpur ( SIKL ) dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Minat dan Bakat Siswa di Era New Normal. BADA’A: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.37216/badaa.v3i1.447
Nur, M. 2003. Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Palmer, D. 2005. “A Motivational View of Constructivist-Informed Teachingâ€. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (15): 1853–1881.
Riduwan. 2012. Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru-Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rudiyanto, M. S. 2008. “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika Volum Benda Putar Bernuansa Kontruktivisme Berbasis Multimedia Komputer dalam CD Interaktifâ€. Makalah diseminar nasionalkan Pascasarjana UNNES. 16 Januari 2008.
Sanjayanti, Sadia, dan Pujani. 2013. “Pengaruh Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Bermuatan Pendidikan Karakter Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dan Sikap Ilmiah Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajarâ€. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3 (1): 1-11.
Satriani, I., Emilia, E., dan Gunawan, M. H. 2012. “Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach to Teaching Writingâ€. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2 (1): 10-22.
Sihono, T. 2004. “Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Sebagai Model Pembelajaran Ekonomi dalam KBKâ€. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 1 (1): 63-83.
Utami, A. C. 2016. “Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran VCT dan CTL dalam Menumbuh Kembangkan Sikap Terhadap Wirausaha Siswa dengan Memperhatikan Kecerdasan Intrapersonal dan Interpersonal Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Kewirausahaan Kelas X SMK N 2 Bandar Lampung Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016â€. Skripsi. Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Yasar, S. dan Anagun, S.S. 2009. “Reliability and Validity Studies of The Science and Technology Course Scientific Attitude Scaleâ€. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2) : 43-54.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.54168/ahje.v3i1.120
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Al Hikmah: Journal of Education publised by Lembaga Pendidikan Hikmatun Najah (LPHN) Blora